Talk:Merchant Customer Exchange

Extremely biased

This article is extremely biased against Merchant Customer Exchange. Due to the nature of the writing (it listed reasons not to use MCX but no reasons in favor of it), it has been speculated that the article was edited by an employee of, or at the direction of, one of Merchant Customer Exchange's competitors. This speculation has arisen, in part, because of the $1 trillion in sales cited in article, the loss to MCX competitors could be in excess of $25 million US in credit card processing fees. Until edited to be less biased, it is my opinion that the information in this article should not be taken as 100% factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wlumplump (talk • contribs) 13:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

As the original creator of the page, I agree that it is lacking in positives about MCX, but I attrribute that more to a lack of information available on CurrentC. I have no relation to any of the companies involved, but I don't understand what you don't find factual. As for the $1 trillion sales figure, that was simply a fact at the time the group formed, and one of the primary reasons why the company's creation was notable 2 years ago. My feeling is that until MCX releases more information about their product, the article (biased as it may be) is still valuable as a summary of what is known.

EDIT: Reading one of the references someone provided, I was able to add more CurrentC info. Hopefully this helps the article be less biased. Eroyce (talk) 15:44, 27 October 2014 (UTC)