Talk:Mercedes-Benz OM642 engine
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
140kW variant?
[edit]I've seen some suggestions on the web that there is a 140kW version of the OM642 used in (at least) the E280; here's one: [1]. From what I've seen the engine is still called "OM642" and the displacement is the same, as is the number of valves. Without a decent source, I'm not going to reformat the article to include that variant. Most of the stuff on the web seems oriented towards the use of the engine in the Sprinter, so it wouldn't surprise me if much of the 'Net was unaware of other usages/variants. -- jhf (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mercedes-Benz OM642. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090606232345/http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2008/04/mercedes-bluete.html to http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2008/04/mercedes-bluete.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205131739/http://www.auto-innovations.com/site/document/mercedescdiv6en.html to http://www.auto-innovations.com/site/document/mercedescdiv6en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Turbo boost pictures look wrong way round
[edit]Boost demand and boost relief are the wrong way. Boost demand should have vanes directing flow into the turbine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.5.111 (talk) 10:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)