Talk:Mercedes-Benz OM352 engine
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comment
[edit]SO, doesn't site any references? What does "(information from the Unimog 435 Workshop manual, Book 1 Section 1.2/1)" mean then? duh?
Added a few more variants of the engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toroa (talk • contribs) 21:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
This Article is not "Stub Class"
[edit]As referenced in the Wikipedia Content assessment table, I believe this article qualifies as a B-Class Article.
B-Class Criteria Assessment
[edit]The Mercedes-Benz OM 352 article meets the established B-Class criteria as outlined by Wikipedia's quality standards. The assessment below is my evaluation of validity to this claim of being a B-Class article. I have enumerated the criteria with my analysis of the article's adherence to these standards.
Referencing and Sources
[edit]- Criterion: The article must be well-referenced, using inline citations from reliable sources. Material that is likely to be challenged should be adequately cited.
- Assessment: The article on the OM 352 engine includes 18 inline citations, showcasing a solid foundation of references from technical literature, industry insights, and historical analyses. This indicates a strong adherence to the criterion of being suitably referenced with reliable sources.
Coverage
[edit]- Criterion: The article should comprehensively cover the subject, avoiding obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It should contain a significant proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, though some sections may require expansion.
- Assessment: With a diverse set sources covering technical specifications and historical context, the article appears to provide comprehensive coverage of the OM 352 engine, aligning well with this criterion.
Structure
[edit]- Criterion: The article should have a coherent structure, with content organized into sections of related material, including a lead section and all other relevant sections for the subject.
- Assessment: The OM 352 article demonstrates a logical and organized structure, with a distinct introduction, life-cycle, and representative datasheet meeting the structural criterion for a B-Class article.
Writing Quality
[edit]- Criterion: The prose of the article should be reasonably well-written, with no significant grammatical errors and a sensible flow. Strict adherence to the Manual of Style is recommended but not strictly necessary for B-Class status.
- Assessment: The clarity and coherence of the writing within the OM 352 article suggest that it meets the writing quality criterion for a B-Class article.
Supporting Materials
[edit]- Criterion: Appropriate supporting materials, such as illustrations, diagrams, and infoboxes, should be included to aid comprehension.
- Assessment: The inclusion of unencumbered image sources and illustrations significantly enhances the article, satisfying the criterion for supporting materials.
Understandability
[edit]- Criterion: The article should be accessible to a broad audience, minimizing the assumption of technical background. Technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
- Assessment: The article, despite its technical nature, is structured in a way that parallels the clarity found in vehicle sales brochures and other literature typically available to the public at vehicle dealerships. This approach ensures that, even with its detailed subject matter, the content remains accessible to a general audience, clearly indicating its focus on a motor vehicle component.
Statement on Article's Validity to the B-Class Claim
[edit]Based on the criteria discussed, the article on the Mercedes-Benz OM 352 diesel engine appears to meet the requirements for B-Class status substantially. It demonstrates a commendable level of research, structure, and inclusion of supporting materials. Continuous improvement in its accessibility and sourcing, while ensuring the lead section effectively summarizes the article remain areas for further development. Contributions from the community are essential for refining the article towards higher quality standards, eventually reaching GA status. Aaronsb (talk) 03:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)