Talk:Mental chronometry

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mental chronometry article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The creation of this page is a group project of Dr. Kent Norman's Spring semester 2006 course, Thinking and Problem Solving, at the University of Maryland, College Park.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 September 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amerenda95.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

At the beginning, before the Contents you need a 1-2 sentence short definition of mental chronometry, such as the second sentence in the Defintion and history section. Then make this section just History. In stead of Major research findings, you may want to make it "Examples in research" or parallel to your last section "Application of mental chronometry in cognitive psychology". When you refer to a study, use the APA format "Posner (1978) ..." Finally, I think that you need to add a little more to the theory and methodology using time to assess a sequence of information processing components. And a little more in the history part. User: Klnorman

Final Comments 10 May 2006

Nicely written. Excellent length and detail for a good scholarly article in Wikipedia. Good formating etc. Group points = 48/50.

Useful Computer Programs that Test the Below?

Has anybody found any useful computer programs that test for the different reaction tests (Posner, et al.?). Or has anyone gone about creating such programs? What are possible (and, hopefully, thoroughly tested) theories that would concern how it is that performance on such tests relates to IQ, general problem solving ability and other studying or knowledge-retrieval/expert-system generating capabilities? For example, would it be likely that someone who performs exceptionally on such tests would also perform exceptionally when in comes to trivia quizzes or mathematical, scientific and practical problem solving?

Has anyone ever tested the effect of sleep deprivation, stress and other similar issues on the performance of such individuals on such tests? User: Hyperclocked 11:41, 26 November 2006

Merge Proposal

I think that this article should be merged with Reaction time. There's a huge amount of overlap, and this article needs a lot of expansion that would result in even more overlap. I think that this should be the destination page rather than RT because as reaction time tests are a measure of mental chronometry, MC covers wider ground overall. I'd be fine merging the sections into RT if there are objections though, likely on the grounds that RT is a lot more active than this article. Either way, I do think these articles should be merged. -Ferahgo the Assassin (talk) 20:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll probably be doing this soon unless anyone has objections, so speak now or forever hold your peace... -Ferahgo the Assassin (talk) 02:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligence citations bibliography for updating this and other articles

You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 02:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mental chronometry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction time

User:Anthonyhcole has re-created and linked the article Reaction Time, which may need to be discussed here since a merge previously occurred. I personally think the newly created page is currently less useful than this one, even if its focus is more precise. People looking for "Reaction time" previously found this article, with plenty of information, but now only see 4 sentences and (at this time) no links towards this one. "Reaction time" occurs 42 times in the this article's text ("mental chronometry" only occurs 13 times), so the subject is also quite unambiguously the same. Prinsgezinde (talk) 13:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sold, Prinsgezinde. I Have moved the definition from Reaction time to this article [1] and made Reaction time a redirect to the definition [2]. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 22:49, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent solution Anthonyhcole, I'm glad this was solved so quickly. Prinsgezinde (talk) 23:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]