Talk:Menominee Indian Reservation

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Menominee Indian Reservation

I corrected your edit to Menominee Indian Reservation. The tribe does not "own" the reservation, it is held in trust by the federal government for the benefit of the tribe. "Own" has a connotation of fee simple lands, which is not the case for this reservation.

I know that you are trying to do a good job and make needed copy-edits, but please be very careful on your edits and the facts. Native American - U.S. relations and laws are very complex, and what is true for one of the over 500 tribes does not necessarily translate to any of the other tribes. In addition to general law (U.S. Code), there are also numerous treaties, court decisions, and other laws that affect the tribes. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 02:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction; I do know about the land being held in trust, but must have been getting tired. Owned didn't seem right and forgot to go back to it. Good to have more than one person looking at these articles. Parkwells (talk) 05:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Menominee Indian Reservation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129032302/http://www.dot.state.wi.us/travel/maps/docs/counties/shawano.pdf to http://www.dot.state.wi.us/travel/maps/docs/counties/shawano.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

"In August 2015 the Menominee Indian Reservation held a vote on proposed measures to legalize medical and/or recreational cannabis." What was the outcome? Kdammers (talk) 23:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]