Jump to content

Talk:Mendy Rudolph

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMendy Rudolph has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 20, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 30, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 15, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
July 22, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

WGN sales

[edit]

Is there any reference for this passage?

"While Mendy was famous as a basketball referee, he was also a television time salesman for many years. He started in television sales in 1960 representing Channel 13 in New York when it was still a commercial TV station and owned by his brother-in-law, Ely Landau.

When Ely Landau sold Channel 13 in the early 1960's to Public Television, Mendy went over to the TV sales staff of WGN-TV, a Chicago television station, as their New York sales representative and worked there for almost 20 years until his passing."

This is a good piece of information and would be great if there was a source. RyguyMN 18:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

The section on his gambling problem needs to provide some context or relate to the other sections in a better way. It might help in particular to mention when he had this gambling problem. This would immediately make it obvious which section to link to.

 Done Clarified when gambling problem took place. RyguyMN 06:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section on other professions is too much like a stub. Best to integrate it in one of the existing sections. Like the above comment, knowing when he held the job may also be useful. Chensiyuan 13:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look to see where I can put this sentence within the article. Maybe it's best to remove it completely? RyguyMN 06:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If taking it out does not dilute the value of the article, then I think it's fine taking it out, at least for now. This is also assuming you can't find a good place to fit the info. Chensiyuan 06:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA passed

[edit]

Well sourced, no obvious POV problems and what seems to be a good depth of coverage. I have a few comments for things which could improve the article further, most of which relate to the writing style.

  • A lot of sentences use "and" to link ideas, which sometimes results in run-on sentences e.g. By 1975, Rudolph's health condition began to deteriorate and was forced to retire after suffering a blood clot in his lung during a 1975 NBA playoff game between the Buffalo Braves and Washington Bullets, played 25 April 1975.
 Done I've attempted to split run-ons. A different set of eyes might want to confirm I got them all. RyguyMN 04:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • At age 20, he was recruited to referee games alongside his father in the Eastern League, during the late 1940s and early 1950s. - you can't be age 20 over a span of several years.
 Done This sentence was re-written. RyguyMN 04:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The latter told Auerbach if he did not shut up, he would be knocked down to the floor with Lovellette. Is that a quote? If it is, quotation marks should be used; if it isn't, more formal language should be used.
 Done The phrase shut up was placed in quotes. RyguyMN 04:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would be useful to state when the NBA Official’s Manual and Case Book was first published.
  • By the early 1970s, Rudolph encouraged the league to adopt a plain gray referee uniform over the traditional "zebra" shirt to de-emphasize the presence of officials in games. - this could do with saying whether or not he had any success.
 Done Added that he was successful with his efforts. RyguyMN 04:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Euphemisms such as "passed away" should not be used when describing death (see here).
 Done Changed "passed away" to "died". RyguyMN 16:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First marriage

[edit]

I'm presuming the first marriage ended in divorce? Unless we want people thinking he was a bigamist it might be a good idea to mention that. John Carter 16:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedited this section for clarity. Thanks for the comment. RyguyMN 16:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Mendy Rudolph/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment. This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
Prose is far from excellent, probably only a 5/10 in places. Nevertheless, I think it is good enough for GA.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
This qualifies comfortably but I would be interested in more information about his gambling addiction and the effects on him and his family.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Rating concern

[edit]

There is inconsistent ratings on this article. GA & A. I see the GA & A review comments. Also I am concerned that no alt text is on any of the images. I thought this was a A-class requirement. My quick run over indicates that GA is warranted, but I have a concern over the GA/A rating issues along with the alt text item. Not enough concern to ask for a formal review, but I think it needs to be addressed. Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more worried about the prose and comprehensiveness. For example, the paragraph on his gambling needs copy-editing and the names of his first wife and their three children are missing. DrKiernan (talk) 07:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mendy Rudolph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mendy Rudolph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mendy_Rudolph&oldid=1193711711"