Talk:Mendocino County GMO Ban

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Excellent, well-researched article. Perhaps the introduction (definition) section could include a bit more info but it's a well written article.Lena815 (talk) 21:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Good job Vince. There is something, however that I think you can improve in this Wikipedia article:

1- you should give more references. Examples: the referendum in 2004 about Measure H (introduction); Measure H (introduction); there is a lack of references also in the second part of "background" section; the green revolution (environmental concerns); "well-known pesticide Roundup produced by Monsanto" in the "causes" section (eliminate "well-know" and give a link or a reference); in "the policy" section teh las sentence needs a reference; in "stakeholders" section these 3 sentences need a reference: "It accounts for approximately one third of Mendocino’s agriculture, the majority of which consists of wineries." "The organic farming industry in California has been the most organized lobby against GEOs due to concerns about cross-pollination." "In 2005, state senator Dean Florez attempted to pass a state preemptive bill prohibiting counties from banning GEOs."; in "evaluation" section this sentence needs a reference: "Mendocino is now cited internationally as a center of the organic movement and a catalyst for anti-GEO movements".

2- why "ban" is written in bold in the first sentence?

3- also more links are needed: California Plant Health Association, CropLife America, Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, RCBA, USDA, FDA, the Mendocino Organic Network, CHPA, FIFRA, EIS, RRA, KWS, NEPA and Mendocino County Farm Bureau

4- in the introduction you wrote: "Mendocino County has been added to an international list of “GMO free zones.”", which are these zones?

5- the references should be put at the end of the sentence (sometimes you put them at the beginning).

6- I think you should divide the environmental concerns section in 2 sub-sections: environmental risks and human health risks.

7- In causes you could say something about the historical behaviour of human beings to control and dominate nature (references to Al Gore and other readings of the semester)

8- the History sections should be organized with bullet points.

Vince005 (talk) 20:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Vince, fantastic work on this article. I agree with most all of the above points by Vince005. Some other points to think about:

When adding links, try to only link the first mention of any given topic, otherwise the links begin to overwhelm the reader, making them useless.
Instead of using <references/> you can use {{reflist|colwidth=30em}}. This template divides the references into columns (except in Internet Explorer), conserving vertical space on the page.
You may consider dividing the references by adding a "Works Cited" section where you list different sources, then list specific instances of each source in the "References" section. Take a look at Forest Park (Portland, Oregon)#References for an example. The goal here is to make it as easy as possible to verify the information in the article.
Ibid. is generally avoided on Wikipedia because for an online article that changes over time and is edited by various authors, this format is easily broken, leading to instances where only the original author knows what it refers to.
References can be named and reused, so that you can point to the same ref for two different points in the article. See Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners#Same reference used more than once on how to do this.

I hope that helps. Please feel free to ask me on my talk page or right here below this post if you need any additional explanation, or if you have any questions. Regards, Jujutacular ^talk 02:09, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if it is nominated it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created or significantly (5x) expanded.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all you need to do is take this code if you created a new article:

{{NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author=  }}

or this code if you expanded it

{{NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=expanded | author= }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say.

Once you've come up with a hook, fill in your username as the author and fill the title of the article, then add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of the appropriate section for the day the article was started on the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on the entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now.

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mendocino County GMO Ban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090415185208/http://gmofreemendo.com:80/moreh.html to http://www.gmofreemendo.com/moreh.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mendocino County GMO Ban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at San Francisco State University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]