Talk:Memjet
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Crappy article
[edit]This is not a article, is propaganda. Should be deleted or revised. --200.189.118.10 14:46, 30 November 2010
This entry was edited (May 26, 2011) and includes additional sourced links. Please comment on any part of this entry that the Wikipedia Community may feel requires further attention. --Jeffbean 92128 21:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Memjet uses a different inkjet technology to achieve pagewidth inkjet printing at speeds of up to 60 pages per minute. Printer manufacturers have been trying to achieve that since the early 1990s. Getting product to market isn't new, HP did that with the Edgeline CM8050. However Memjet's intended price-point seems to be much lower. If the Memjet technology does succeed then there is great potential for change in the printer market. So this subject would then be as notable as those on laser printers. So the article as it stands isn't good but there is a need for an article to exist. I don't feel qualified to improve it at the moment - I've been aware of Silverbrook and Memjet but don't know enough about the machine(s) at present. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.117.16 (talk) 13:40, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
The machine is selling in the USA now, and I found the article to be extremely helpful, specially the article references with their respective links. I'm investigating the capabilities of the printer for my business and I will likely purchase the machine if it can print in the media that I need. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FernandoNell (talk • contribs) 07:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
How about explaining what the hell their technology is, even in the vaguest terms? No? Ok, let's talk about where the chief executive used to work and in which countries they have an office and some internal beef that holds very little value to anyone outside the organizations involved. This article is beyond useless. I've never been compelled to drop a note on a talk page before but congrats- this one did it for me. 38.130.88.241 (talk) 09:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)