Talk:Melophagus rupicaprinus

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

My edits

Why are you reverting? 1. All sections should be complete sentences. A single word does not a section make. If the sentence is very short, it doesn't deserve a section. 2. [[Fly|fly]] is redundant. 3. Taxoboxes should typically use the default ranks display and only show additional ranks when needing to show intermediary ranks from the article's top-most rank to the next major rank. As this is a species article, the next major rank is genus. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Simuliid: What is wrong with what I have? Please revert back to my version. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could ask the very same question about your edits? Why do think your edits are superior? In my view, they seem to read like a child's work, rather than encyclopedic. Simuliid (talk) 17:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I stated above. We are an encyclopedia, not a catalogue. We should use complete sentences, not a one word entry in a section. If you want it to read better, write more. If you are only complaining about the Distribution section, why did you undo my other changes? - UtherSRG (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If my edits are so unliked, maybe I should give my valuable time elsewhere, And not on Wikipedia Simuliid (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what I said. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]