Talk:Melanotan II

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-02-27. The result of the discussion was Merge to Melanotan.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Protection

Due to the persistent edit-warring between two unregistered users, I have semi-protected this article. To those two editors: please resolve your differences on this page and come to some consensus on the content with other editors. Thank you. Rockpocket 06:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, I have to say that I'm very uncomfortable with the COI involved when the proprietor of a website makes edits which insert the name of his website into articles. 69.108.204.176 (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources modified on Melanotan II

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just attempted to maintain the sources on Melanotan II. I managed to add archive links to 4 sources, out of the total 4 I modified, whiling tagging 0 as dead.

Please take a moment to review my changes to verify that the change is accurate and correct. If it isn't, please modify it accordingly and if necessary tag that source with {{cbignore}} to keep Cyberbot from modifying it any further. Alternatively, you can also add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page's sources altogether. Let other users know that you have reviewed my edit by leaving a comment on this post.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Melanotan II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090912150202/http://cosmopolitan.com.au/fool_gold.htm to http://www.cosmopolitan.com.au/fool_gold.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/01/tan/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7895366.stm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218195906/http://www.mhra.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Pressreleases/CON031009 to http://www.mhra.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Pressreleases/CON031009
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090417045006/http://www.slk.no/templates/InterPage____65110.aspx to http://www.slk.no/templates/InterPage____65110.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090417045159/http://www.slk.no/templates/InterPage____80434.aspx to http://www.slk.no/templates/InterPage____80434.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]