Talk:Mel Kiper Jr.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

NO INFO??? HISTORY?

When did he start his business? What age? Who bought his first draft information. NOTHING in this article.

Why Protected?

Why is this protected? Also, the assertion that Kiper predicted Stafford would be drafted #1 out of high school needs a citation. 70.164.58.180 (talk) 16:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was protected for repeated vandalism such as [1], [2] and many more. Kevin (talk) 22:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This a Wikapedia Mel Kiper page. Not only should vandalism be allowed but encouraged! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.110.70.146 (talk) 10:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But you have left in he lives with his dog, Mel Kiper III? Really? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.23.22.23 (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um this article used to be much better. Couldn't it be protected at it's former glory? Hey thanks for the Einstein leaving the fact that he is controversial on here without any examples why. OH WAIT, the article in the past gave examples but it was shortened for some reason. Articles don't need to be shortened to these piddling 1 paragraph articles unless they really need to. In closing, I would like to offer a nice sized "FU" to the person who shortened this article and I look forward to the condescending explanation I always get from some higher up in cases like this like they saved the world or something or protected us from ourselves. Timmyfitz161 (talk) 16:49, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really?

This reads more like a sales pitch telling me why Mel Kiper is great then a wiki article. All of the purported things said about how he revolutionized the draft or how accurate he is have no citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Odin1 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]