Talk:Meitetsu 3300 series
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Meitetsu 3150 series page were merged into Meitetsu 3300 series on 13 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history. |
Proposed merge of Meitetsu 3150 series with Meitetsu 3300 series
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- consensus to merge: request open long enough, unanimous support for the requested merge. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
The two train types are nearly identical, with the exception being their formations. I doubt there will be much overlap given the similarities between the two articles. XtraJovial (talk) 03:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support merging 3150 series into 3300 series Per nom, and also for consistency with the ja wiki. Jumpytoo Talk 18:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- support due to Meitetsu's habit of using different classifications for largely similar trains. Same thing as the 9500 and 9100 series being covered in just one article. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support for reasons mentioned above by other users Exp691 (talk) 03:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
@XtraJovial, Jumpytoo, Nyamo Kurosawa, and Exp691: It looks like there is unanimous support for this merge. I think you could go ahead and complete it. Joyous! | Talk 02:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Already forgot that this is still open. Im busy offwiki, but if noone is faster, i'd do the merge somwehat soon. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 22:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.