Talk:Meiko Scientific

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elan/Elite description

The in-depth description of the CS-2's Elan/Elite interconnect would probably be more appropriate in the Meiko CS-2 article. Letdorf 12:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Completed merges into Meiko Scientific. Still not enough information to warrant separate articles.Awotter (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Propose to merge two stub articles into main article to make the main article more encyclopedic, will also need a reworked summary paragraph and additional sections and inline citations.Awotter (talk) 20:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I'd like to keep the articles separate. Meiko Scientific was a company, MeikOS was an operating system and the Computing Surface and CS-2 were computers. I think they all deserve separate articles, just as (for instance) Sun Microsystems, SunOS and Sun-4 all have their own articles. The Meiko Scientific article should, of course, focus on the company and its history, and only briefly describe its products. I still have some source material I've been meaning to use to expand these articles, if you think they are a bit on the short side. Letdorf (talk) 12:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for replying, I think the difference is simply the fact that the company article will never be all that comprehensive unlike the much larger and longer lived companies like Sun. When you combine these articles you don't lose the information, because they can be in significant sections of their own (it's very easy to do a redirect to a particular subsection if someone is say, just searching for info on MeikOS. Combining them puts each in the larger context and would then allow us to make the whole article consistent with the manual of Style guidelines. A strong summary section showing the notability of each section, provides a central place for references and makes it unnecessary to try and summarize information that is duplicate or redundant. In the end you don't have three stub articles that a reader has to navigate between and if other editors come along later they wouldn't be adding potentially important information not summarized elsewhere .Awotter (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meiko Scientific. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.top500.org/orsc/1998/cs-2.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021201043305/http://www.npac.syr.edu/nse/hpccsurvey/orgs/meiko/meiko.html to http://www.npac.syr.edu/nse/hpccsurvey/orgs/meiko/meiko.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Website no longer exists

meiko.com is now some german glass company website Dany0 (talk) 08:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]