Talk:Mehra

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Untitled

Mehra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous1079 (talk • contribs) 09:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khatri

I've just removed some stuff here. The Shodganga archive has recently been discussed at WT:INB and the highly variable nature of the papers it hosts was raised. Furthermore, p 4 of that particular source contradicts p 30, which goes to prove the point. And, finally, we can't say a name "belongs" to something. Yes, it may have its origins in a place, occupation etc but no place, occupation etc "owns" a name. Classic examples in proof of this include Tony Meo, who is most definitely not connected to Meo, and Helen Reddy, who is certainly not a Reddy. - Sitush (talk) 06:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tatichat keeps adding poor sources to this article, trying to assert that the name "belongs" to the Khatri clan. It is far from being the entire picture, I feel. For example, although I can only see snippet view, Singh, Kumar Suresh, ed. (1998). India's Communities. People of India. Vol. 5. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19563-354-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editorlink= ignored (|editor-link= suggested) (help) mentions several groups that use the name: a Scheduled Caste found in the Bastar/Orissa area (also spelled Mahar etc, see p. 2077) and a community in Himachal Pradesh (also known as Kusha, Kashyap Rajput and Mehre, see p. 2273). Clearly, the inference that this is a name only used by a clan of the Khatri people is incorrect. - Sitush (talk) 11:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regardging the comments above by Sitush can you give me some articles that are high level which state something else for the Mehra . thanks. You have been trying to ignore facts, I do not know if its a jelousy or something. There are 100's of names on Wikipedia which state castes in the wiki articles and all sources are as strong as mine or weaker and yet Wikipedia does not go in and delete them. If you want examples let me knowTatichat (talk) 12:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The "national" series of The People of India, of which the item I link above is a part, is considered to be a reliable source. The "states" series is not ... but that is not what I am referring to. And please stop these accusations of jealousy etc that you are spewing across several pages. I have no horse in this race. - Sitush (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tatichat edits all are on Khatri caste. What I inferring from these edits that Tatichat just want to glorify the Khatri caste and wants to mention it anywhere where he can.--Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 15:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mehra

Whoever keeps editing this is adding incorrect information. Mehra is not a surname belonging to Indian clans. The name is an ancient Zoroastrian term predating the clans referred to by the editor. Wikipedia is not a place for Hindu nationalism. Yes Mehra is a name found in India but it also has an older historical meaning.

Mehra is a surname found in India and Iran. Also Mehra is a Parsi Girls name, the meaning of the name is "Affectionate, Kind" from Persian origin. This name is mainly used in Parsi. As per Indian Hindu astrology, this name is suggested for Who born with star Magha Nakshatra 4th pada, Simha rasi (Leo)..[1] This surname derives from the word Mihir, meaning sun, [2] or master.[1] (21 2A04:4A43:507F:D976:307B:9FEC:251D:79FF (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mehra is a surname found in India and Iran. The meaning of the name is "Affectionate, Kind" from Persian origin. This surname derives from the word Mihir, meaning sun, [2] or master.[1] 92.40.202.79 (talk) 19:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]