Talk:Mega Piranha

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

WTF?

I watched some of the movie, and it was beyond stupid. That is all that needs to be said about it. Thank you for your time. --63.3.2.130 (talk) 06:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Asylum does have a certain style of film making that isn't for everyone.

Jason Solomons of The Guardian newspaper mentions the film in his Film Weekly Podcast (Film Weekly lives the dream with Leonardo DiCaprio (15 July 2010) describing it as "the fishiest film this year, so bad it's good, Mega Piranha."

He mentions it briefly about 20 minutes into the podcast. His co-presenter is skeptical. -- Horkana (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found a blog which lists the mostly 1 star

reviews the film received. You'd want to have a proper reference (URL preferably but issue and date might work) for any review you want to mention here. -- Horkana (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mega Piranha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]