Talk:Mega Man Zero 4/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Result: Delist MuZemike 16:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that this article be delisted from GA status for the following reasons:

The fair-use rationales of all the images are lacking; that is, they don't go into detail as to the purposes justifying usage of the images (see WP:NFCC).
There seems to be too much undue weight placed on the gameplay and plot compared to the development and reception. The development section in particular is sorely lacking and is in need of updating.
The plot section seems to remain in-universe; that is, the content is not from a real-world perspective and does not try to utilize both primary and secondary sources (see WP:WAF).
Many sources given are self-published reader reviews which are not good for verifiability those sources are as follows:
- IceTGressa (2005-09-05). "Megaman Zero 4". Retrieved 2007-01-24.
- xybazelu. "Mega Man Zero 4 Codes". GameFAQs. Retrieved 2007-01-17. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help)
- Aeon17x (2005-10-05). "Rock Man Zero 4 - FAQ/Walkthrough v1.04". GameFAQs. Retrieved 2007-01-17. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
- ~~N Amer (2005-10-04). "Mega Man Zero 4". GameZone. Retrieved 2007-02-19. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)~~

All the above reasons combined I fell justify the need to delist this until necessary improvements can be made. MuZemike 15:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lulz, the GameZone review isn't a reader review, N Amer stands for North America, the reviewer is Dakota Grabowski. Someone another 02:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Crossed out. MuZemike 18:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the lack of edit activity, I am delisting the article from GA status. Article can be renominated for GA whenever the appropriate improvements are made. MuZemike 16:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]