Talk:Meena Kumari (book)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 15:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: Nicholas Michael Halim (talk · contribs) at 05:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

as soon as she died in March 1972 — "soon after her death in March 1972"
Her performance as a desperate wife in the 1962 romantic drama Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam is regarded as one of her career's bests — who regards it?
the film itself failed at the box office — remove 'itself'
All 3,000 copies of the first edition were sold out after six days. — exactly 3,000, or approximately 3,000?
visible, but ... it was — add a non-breaking space ({{nbsp}}) before the ellipsis.
It was received positively by many critics — this is cited to a primary source, where the author is same as the author of the book. We'll need secondary sources for such evaluative claims.
- This still needs a secondary source: Critics showed enthusiastic response to it – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change:

{| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"
|-

to

{| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"
|+ {{Sronly|Publication history of the book: Meena Kumari}}

Rest good. I should note that there are various primary sources used, but mostly are used for direct quotations and content of the book, which should be fine.
Images can take ALT text