Talk:Meds (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Untitled

Read This passage. I maintain that despite the little picture of the album at the top, this article has nothing whatsoever to do with this album. Posting the review here, out of context, is just more confusing than informative. Dybeck 08:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The song title "Space Monkey" may be a reference to the novel/movie Fight Club, where space monkeys were the shaved soldiers of Project Mayhem.

The Kurt Cobain reference in not totally correct, as well is unneeded here! It should be edited out! The song referenced came out long after his death. The info on this page reads as it is a review of the album. Please leave this to either a blog or some album review website such as pitchforkmedia --buzlink 16:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Placebomeds.jpg

Image:Placebomeds.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation Needed?

I feel there are sufficient interpretations of the word MEDS that a disambiguation page could be warranted. In addition to the links given at the top of the article, I propose to add MEDS Band (similar to MICS - Medical_Implant_Communication_Service). AncientBrit 23:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because I Want You merge proposal

The WP:NOTABILITY of "Because I Want You", outside of a solitary chart placing, is dubious, and the article is a stub. I propose the article be merged with this. 165.228.231.15 (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 October 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per discussion (non-admin closure) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meds → Meds (album) – I would say most would expect Meds to be a primary redirect to Medication, not an article about this Placebo album. 162 etc. (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support, possibly disambiguate. I would be surprised if there are not other potential meanings of the word. BD2412 T 04:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Medication gets 18,410 views compared with 1,876[[1]] for the album and all Google results other than this WP article are for the medication meaning or similar. Probably redirect to Medication (disambiguation) or create a new DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with this also, I think the creation of a new disambiguation page (at Meds (disambiguation), most likely) is needed. Sean Stephens (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support and redirect Meds to Medication.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support and redirect Meds to Medication. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose although I generally prefer disambiguation, I don't see anything other than the album called Meds. Why do we want to let a slang abbrev to get such treatment instead? Dicklyon (talk) 04:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support good argument by the nominator. Lesliechin1 (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per principle of least astonishment. Sean Stephens (talk) 23:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Abandoned user draft

Please would an interested editor assess the material added at User talk:Violetcries/sandbox, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 13:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]