Talk:Medical ghostwriter
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Guidelines from International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for determining authorship of and contributorship to medical journal articles.
[edit]Reading this article, I was surprised to see that the Vancouver Group Requirements (not the "Vancouver Style" for medical journal article citations, that's a separate issue) for determining who is an author of a medical journal article, who is a contributor to a medical journal article, and where these guidelines may be found are completely absent from the article. That is a grievous omission.
As a degreed technical writer active in assisting physicians, surgeons and other medical researchers in gaining professional recognition for their original research, I feel that any article dealing with "medical ghostwriting" is fatally flawed unless the issue of hard and fast guidelines for determining and crediting authorship and contributorship in a medical journal article is dealt with in detail. It's an easy issue to resolve, and the guidelines for dealing with it are so concise they can be quoted verbatim in a Wikipedia article. Which I did.
This article NOW (after the changes I made) equips the reader to be able to say who is an author of a medical journal article - using the very same guidelines medicine uses to establish that same fact. The reader is also now able to determine in general terms who is a contributor to a medical journal article using the same guidelines medicine uses to establish that fact. Finally, the previously undealt-with issue of how authorship and contributorship guidelines are enforced, who draws them up and who polices them is now dealt with in the text.loupgarous (talk) 10:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Medical ghostwriter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130716034114/http://www.amwa.org/amwa_ethics_faqs to http://www.amwa.org/amwa_ethics_faqs
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130330082923/http://www.icmje.org/publishing_2corrections.html to http://www.icmje.org/publishing_2corrections.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)