Talk:Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV

How is it that the only source in this article is a bogus anti-tort reform study, when all reputable economists acknowledge the positive effect MICRA had on insurance rates? THF (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV? This stub is not comprehensive enough to have a NPOV problem.

This article is basically just a stub and does not even include all of the major provisions of MICRA. Basically there are only four or five anyway.I assume that you are referring to the "effect of the statute" with your NPOV complaint. The effect of the statue both here and as a model for other states is virtually undisputed. Physicians claimed a malpractice insurance crisis before the statute. That claim has gone away.the fact that the $250,000 noneconomic damages cap (pain-and-suffering) has not been raised in more than 35 years speaks volumes. Even states that have followed the California model with their own versions of MICRA have raised this number without much political controversy. If you want to complain about something, complained that this important contribution to the health care debate is a virtual stub in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Da5id403 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing two tags from early 2010

Removing the Expert required, and OR tags from 2/2010 after reviewing this and adding additional references, and finding no discussion on talk page. If anyone disagrees, I invite you to be WP:BOLD and revert or discuss.Boogerpatrol (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/documents/1008.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.micra.org/patient-access/docs/micra_study_ca_micra_reforms.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nsmadocs.org/PDF_08/FINAL_Nevada%20Medical%20Malpractice%20Report%2011-03-2008.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140616001052/http://www.stophigherhealthcarecosts.com/who-we-are/ to http://www.stophigherhealthcarecosts.com/who-we-are/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]