Talk:MediaInfo

How is this free and open-source when it's $0.99 on the Mac App Store?

The article is misleading to say this, right? They do offer to compile the source on the Mac, but you are not able to download a compiled Mac version unless you pay for it on the App Store. I think the opening description should be therefore changed to make sure no misleading of users on Google occurs, because this claim is absolutely not true for Mac users. I'm not a FOSS or FLOSS expert, but there's a mismatch here that should be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindfulinfo (talk • contribs) 22:00, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Free software, but Adware

Free software/Adware

Free software/Adware = Free software and open source code but supported by advertising, usually with a included browser toolbar. It may be disabled when installing or after installation. www.videohelp.com/tools/MediaInfo

mediainfo.sourceforge.net/en/Bundled

MediaInfo is distributed by a Commercial Organisation
The software distributor displays advertisements during the installation of our software.
These ads enable the end user to install the advertisers' programs if they want to.
When a MediaInfo installer chooses to install an advertised package, the generated revenue is shared between the distributor and MediaInfo.
There is absolutely no post-installation advertising with MediaInfo.
Nor is there any "call home" (except if you want to be informed of new releases -
you can uncheck the corresponding checkbox in the preference screen, at any time, if you don't want to be informed of new versions).
Is it adware?
Some may consider this distribution "bundling" as adware.
On the other hand, the distributor does not show the usual nasty negative traits of adware:

   Ads are shown only as one step in the MediaInfo installation. Once installed - no more ads! That's a promise.
   No unwanted software is installed - sponsored offer is explicitely indicated as such. Totally your choice!
   No private information is gathered from you except for basic data polling such as language, OS and geographic location for advertisement selection during installation.

For details see the software distribution network privacy policy.
Why did you partner with them?
In order to generate a little bit of revenue to help continue developing, offering, and supporting our software at no cost to our users - you.
Software developers who have starved to death in poverty are precious little use at improving their products.

-96.237.4.73 (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MediaInfo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230235647/http://www.paehl.de/cms/node/10/revisions to http://www.paehl.de/cms/node/10/revisions

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]