Talk:Mechanical aptitude

Mechanical aptitude received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Ball State University supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

copyright violation/plagarism concern

Please see this issue, and correct / respond ASAP. Thank you. Mjtagler (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A little light peer review

Hello,

Starting an article from scratch is quite hard (harder than building on one that somebody else started). It's off to a relatively good start.
Overall, I think the article has a good structure but there are some empty sections - are you planning to put some content in these? Setting out with an obvious framework for the article's structure is a Good Thing, but the downside is that whilst it's under construction, big gaps are visible.
However, copyright violation can be a serious problem. Parts of it seem to be identical to other content on the internet ([1]). That must be fixed.
Nice choice of sources, and references have been used well. It wouldn't hurt to find some more sources, of course - to help cover more ground because at the moment it's quite tightly focussed on Wiesen and Barron's.
Prose addressed to "you" is not ideal. It's only a trivial thing but with a little rephrasing, it would read more like an encyclopaedia article and less like an instruction manual.
Otherwise, the text is easy to read and neutral; spelling, grammar, and layout are good.
It's a little surprising to read that tests are made more gender-neutral by including things that women understand, like kitchen implements. It's probably not a problem but it does have a slightly worrying undertone. Does Murchinsky really say that? (Possibly in reference to some older study)

bobrayner (talk) 00:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BSU Team

Obviously, the background and uses sections must be completed. What is the hold up here? Article history shows me edits only from 2 of the 3 team members. Mjtagler (talk) 17:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Type of Tests Edit

Hi Wiki-editors,

I'm a student in an I/O Psychology course at CUNY York College as part of an assignment, editing articles on wikipedia is required. Here is a link of the information I will place on the article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/edit1

So what do you think, I would like get some feedback.

Thanks,

Xyzbb1253 (talk) 04:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mechanical aptitude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://digitialcommons.unf.edu/ojii_volumes/132
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.talentlens.com/en/downloads/samplequestion/Bennett.jpg
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304053312/http://www.linnbenton.edu/auto/natef/WTMA.pdf to http://www.linnbenton.edu/auto/natef/WTMA.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]