Talk:Mebroot

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Computer Security: Computing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

New article (previously a redirect)

mebroot was originally redirecting to Torpig but as far as I understand, mebroot is a component used by Torpig, "a stealth installer" but it is not the entire project. Utopiah (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Windows 98 vulnerable?

If these are different names for the same thing (Mebroot/Sinowal/MBR/Torpig), can it (or they) correctly run as designed on a Windows 98 system? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.52.46 (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]