Talk:Meade Instruments/Archive 1

Archive 1

Removed redirect to Mead and started new article as Meade is more commonly known as a telescope manufacturer than an alternative spelling of Mead (drink). Garglebutt 23:37, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)

Televue copies?

After adding the following text I ended up removing it as it is unsubstantiated:

The series 5000 eyepieces are considered by some to be copies of Televue designs with the characteristics of the Plossl, Super Wide Angle, and Ultra Wide Angle eyepieces being near identical to the equivalent Televue Radian, Panoptic, and Nagler eyepieces with only minor differences in focal length. Garglebutt / (talk) 05:40, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Cleanups

Re-arranged the page into a more standardized version using format I have used for Celestron and Questar Corporation. Barrowed info box and some of the format from General Motors page. Halfblue 03:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Meade logo.gif

Image:Meade logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Should we really call the RC Meades "modified Ritchey-Chrétien"?

Should we really call the RC Meades "modified Ritchey-Chrétien"? This is precisely the subject of the lawsuit against Meade. They are marketing telescopes that are architecturally basically Schmidt Cassegrains with a different secondary mirror as "modified Ritchey-Chrétien". It seems to me that by using Meade's marketing definition, the wikipedia community is effectively siding with them in this dispute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.199.251 (talk) 06:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)