Talk:McKittrick Canyon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the McKittrick Canyon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

McKittrick Canyon could use a section focused on geology. Leaflet (talk) 01:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image Gallery

I believe the image gallery guideline should lead us to transwiki the image gallery in this article to Commons. That guideline states that image galleries should only be used in Wikipedia

"if a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images. The images in the gallery collectively must have encyclopedic value and add to the reader's understanding of the subject."

It is my belief that multiple landscape images of McKittrick Canyon do not fulfill this guideline, and hence the gallery should reside at Commons —hike395 (talk) 06:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I say they would be ok if the article and the captions were expanded, but as it stands they do not. On a side note, where does the 411 acres in infobox come from? If it means anything itt has to refer to some unmentioned specific part of the canyon, because there is no way the entire canyon is only 411 acres. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, if the article were longer, then the three photographs, suitably captioned, could be scattered in the text of the article. That is another way to follow the image gallery guidelines. I don't know where the 411 acres came from --- perhaps the NPS? —hike395 (talk) 20:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]