Talk:McDonnell XV-1

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

XV-1 designation

Wouldn't this sentence Finally, the aircraft became the first vehicle in the convertiplane series as the XV-1. refer to the US Air Force's pre-1962 designation system? I think the Air Force was the only service to use dashes in its designations. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Army used dashes also; H-13, H-25, H-40, etc. --Born2flie (talk) 02:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McDonnell XV-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927042104/http://www.vtol.org/pdf/summer06robb.pdf to http://www.vtol.org/pdf/summer06robb.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on McDonnell XV-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hey

I added a hyperlink to the V-22 Osprey page under a subheader of "Modern day aircraft with comparable configuration" which I also added specifically for the new hyperlink entry. Another user by the name of BilCat reverted the change, stating "actually it's a completely different configuration - tiltrotor vs. compound gyroplane". Now I'm not an expert in this field, so I believe him, and of course false information has no place on Wikipedia, so I don't challenge the revert. However, I still feel there is a connection between the two, no? Like maybe not comparable configuration, but rather a shared concept, of combining helicopter hover ability with high speeds of airplanes? Maybe my phrasing was a little off? -Seth Knops (talk) 16:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]