Talk:McDonald's Cycle Center/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Just one issue with prose that will not preclude the article from passing:

• Details "Awnings produce shade for the interior." This seems to be stated a little matter-of-factly. If something can be explained about how the awnings work or why they were needed this would help.

1. B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Very well done and informative article. No vital improvements necessary at the time of review. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)