Talk:McCulloch Motors Corporation/Archives/2016

Untitled

from VfD:

Was deleted out of process. Undeleted per VfU. Let it run the VfD gauntlet. — Gwalla | Talk 22:48, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Weak keep. National-level or better companies that have been around for a few decades are encyclopedic, but I'm not sure what else can be said here. I've cleaned up the article a little in any case. - RedWordSmith 23:33, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. There's nothing wrong with having articles on notable companies. It needs expansion, though. Factitious 00:10, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. It definitely could use some expansion, though I'm not entirely sure how it can be expanded. But it's definitely deserving of an article. It's a legitimate national company. Modargo 01:44, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Send to RfE and delete if not expanded. Note that this takes the whole last name of McCulloch. Also note that it needs expansion to actually tell the reader much at all. Geogre 03:21, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Is there an article about McCulloch as a last name? If so, disambiguation should be set up. If not, the current situation is fine until one is written. In either case, there's no need to delete. Factitious 04:10, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • I didn't vote to delete. I voted to send it to RfE and to delete it if that fails. Clean Up used to do expansion, but that doesn't seem to happen there anymore. I'd like to say "Send to clean up," but I think this is aggravatingly insufficient for the company, and I don't like reserving a family name without good cause. I'd like this article to become the good cause. Geogre 05:45, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • I must have misunderstood you, then. I'd thought you were bringing up the last name as a reason to delete the article if it's not expanded. Factitious 01:24, Nov 23, 2004 (UTC)
• Send to RfE, if that fails VfD again. --fvw* 06:24, 2004 Nov 21 (UTC)
• Keep. More notable than an elf.Dr Zen 07:02, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• keep, not paper... —siroχo 10:46, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Noteworthy. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 18:17, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and send to cleanup. It's a pretty good substub as it stands. - Lucky 6.9 00:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Extreme keep. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:04, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion