Jump to content

Talk:McCleskey v. Kemp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some Proposed Changes

[edit]

Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.

Add to the end of the Impact section:

Some academics have argued that the impact of McCleskey v. Kemp has largely been overstated.[1] Even though McCleskey v. Kemp seems to dismiss statistical racial disparities as doctrinally irrelevant in equal protection claims, admissions statistics have been used in judicial opinions, such as Grutter v. Bollinger.[2][3]

Cf2022 (talk) 08:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Cf2022[reply]

 Done Ferkijel (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Feingold, Jonathan (2018). "Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tell Us About the Supreme Court's Use of Social Science". Northwestern University Law Review. 112.
  2. ^ Feingold, Jonathan (2018). "Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tell Us About the Supreme Court's Use of Social Science". Northwestern University Law Review. 112.
  3. ^ Devins, Neal (2003). "Explaining Grutter v. Bollinger". 152. University of Pennsylvania Law Review.