Talk:McBoyle v. United States

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Incorrect interpretation]

This was found at the bottom of the article page [in all-caps]:

The given interpretation of this decision is incorrect. The court reversed the decision of the lower courts claiming, in the quote above, that if legislators want to make an impact with their laws then they need to make their statues more specific. Holmes claims that because the statue explicitly talks about those vehicles secured to the ground that airplanes are not included in this statute.

Umm, I'm unable to determine what exactly in the article you are disputing! It sounds like you're agreeing with the article yet saying it's wrong. Maybe you're saying that the article is not complete? Sure, that's what the "this is a stub" means. I can find every fact mentioned in the article in the decision (at, e.g., [1]) so I'm removing the disputed tag. Derobert 15:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McBoyle v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051022020759/http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/mcboyle.htm to http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/mcboyle.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]