Talk:Mayo Building (Tulsa, Oklahoma)

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Petroleum Building

I was looking for buildings to take photos of when I had a trip to Tulsa recently and came across Petroleum Building. Only after did I discover this page. Looks to me like they refer to the same exact building. Obviously the stubs should be merged, but it's not clear which one is more notable. Which page should merge into which? 0x0077BE ^{(talk · contrib)} 01:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not merge these articles. The Petroleum Building (420 S. Boulder) and the Mayo Building (420 S. Main) are two different buildings, one block apart. The Petroleum Building article displayed a mis-identified photo of the Mayo Building, and in the infobox gave the S. Main address rather than S. Boulder. I have fixed these problems by: changing the address in the Petroleum Building infobox, removing the photo from the Petroleum Building article, requesting that the mis-identified photo be renamed at the Commons, correcting the image description at the Commons. Good job scouting out National Register photos! If you have another chance to get to Tulsa, go out and get the Petroleum Building! Here's some additional information about the two buildings for you: Petroleum (text, photos), Mayo (text, photos). — Ipoellet (talk) 01:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt I'll go to Tulsa again. I think I was confused by the incorrect info in the boxes. I actually may have a photograph of the Petroleum Building, though, because I was lost and saw a building that said "420" on it and assumed it was the right one. I need to run right now, feel free to remove the merge templates. I'll see if I have a photo of the Petroleum Building among my discards. 0x0077BE ^{(talk · contrib)} 01:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the banners. Hope you find that pic. Once again, good footwork! — Ipoellet (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ipoellet. I just checked, I do have two photos of the Petroleum Building. Not as well framed as the Mayo Building ones because I thought I was at the wrong place, but I'll see what I can do with cropping and upload them when I get back. Sorry for the confusion. 0x0077BE ^{(talk · contrib)} 02:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

I don't want to step on any toes, but I think one of the photos I took is probably at a somewhat better angle than the one that is currently up there, so I was thinking of replacing the infobox photo. Here is a gallery of the photos I took of this building (thinking it was the Petroleum Building):

Personally, I'm in favor of the first one, but I think the second one might work as well. Any opposition to me replacing the photo that's currently there with the first photo in that gallery? 0x0077BE ^{(talk · contrib)} 04:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I have the camera raw files for these, so if anyone thinks they should be re-cropped and/or the tone adjusted, I can do that pretty easily. 0x0077BE ^{(talk · contrib)} 05:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see any objection, so I went ahead and used the first one. 0x0077BE ^{(talk · contrib)} 04:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article classification

This article meets the criteria for Start class. Bruin2 (talk) 22:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mayo Building (Tulsa, Oklahoma). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715155729/http://www.ocgi.okstate.edu/shpo/nhrpdfs/10001013.pdf to http://www.ocgi.okstate.edu/shpo/nhrpdfs/10001013.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mayo Building (Tulsa, Oklahoma). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111209040502/http://tulsapreservationcommission.org/nationalregister/buildings/index.pl?id=74 to http://www.tulsapreservationcommission.org/nationalregister/buildings/index.pl?id=74

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]