Talk:Mauser Model 1893/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
I will take this one, comments to follow in next few days. Zawed (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Lead
- The last sentence of the 1st para - mentions flush with bottom of stock/rifle twice.
- Fixed
Development
- A few terms could be linked, e.g. box magazine, stock (firearms), extractor (firearms), bolt (firearms)
- Done
Description
- "As was standard for Mauser rifles, a three-position safety...": suggest "As was standard for Mauser rifles, the M1893 was configured with a three-position safety..." or something similar
- Good idea
- "...did not include a third, rear locking lug, which was introduced with the Model 1895." The notes that end this sentence are out of order
- Fixed
Derivatives
- "M1894 rifles were also sold to Brazil, chambered in 7&n mm,...": please check the dimensions for the round
- Fixed, good catch
Ottoman variant
- "Most all of these rifles still..": Needs to be rephrased depending on whether all rifles or most of them were rebarrelled
- Fixed.
References
- Hamilton is not in alphabetical order
- No, the one before is "de" and the one after is "Peterson"
- Westwood doesn't seem to be cited at all
- He is - FN 26
- Whoops, how did I miss that...Zawed (talk) 07:42, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- He is - FN 26
Other stuff
- Image tags seem appropriate
- No dupe links
- No dab links
- External links check out OK
Will check back in a few days. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 14:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good, passing as GA. Zawed (talk) 07:42, 14 March 2018 (UTC)