Talk:Maus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 20:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to reviewing this article. I would like to alert contributing editors that checklinks found a broken link in the article. Please address this in the meantime while I complete the review. Thanks! --Tea with toast (話) 20:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to do this. I've fixed the broken link issue by finding another source—the source I was using seems to have vanished from Google's memory... CüRlyTüRkey^Talk_Contribs 21:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
--Excellent job with all the sources. I appreciate the citation style you have used.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
--Great job bringing in images from other related topics to help dress the article up.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
--This is an impressive and well crafted article. I can see that I lot of hard work went into detailing the background information and sources. I can't think of much that is left to do to improve the article. Great job! --Tea with toast (話) 23:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]