Talk:Mauritania at the 2000 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"The Comité National Olympique et Sportif Mauritanien (The National Olympic Committee (NOC) of Mauritania) was recognized" - recognised

The word "Meters" should be spelt as "metres" in this instance
Maybe include the medal results for the women's 100 m like with the men's 1500 m
"and was drawn into the third heat" - changed the text in bold to assigned to for some variety
"and the bronze medal was taken by Kenyan Bernard Lagat." - by fellow Kenyan Bernard Lagat. or something similar
Maybe add the "scope=col" field to the data table for improved accessibility per MOS:DTT

That is all from my side. Nothing major needs action taken to get this to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All taken care of, copied in the information about the 100m, though complicated, from another of my GAs. Courcelles (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- MWright96 Forgot to ping. Courcelles (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Courcelles: Promoted to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 07:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]