Talk:Mauda

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Maharashtra / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Khalidkhoso 11:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus is that "Mauda" is the correct spelling, and moreover is the primary topic. A hatnote should be added to this article for anyone looking for Mauda, Poland. Aervanath (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mouda → Mauda – Correct spelling as per government records. Currently, Mauda takes us to a small place in Poland with population of just 50. This article is about a town in Maharashtra, India with a population of about 32,000 relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 11:59, 22 May 2012 (UTC) Shivashree (talk) 12:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC) Orig. time stamp: 06:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from WP:RM#Technical requests. Requests to rename geographic entities are too frequently contested for me to treat it as uncontroversial. Favonian (talk) 12:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Was a bit sceptical going in, but I now agree that the Indian town is the primary topic. While not a perfect tool, google books gives 1890 results for "Mauda" India, compared to 126 for "Mauda" Poland and I got a similar ratio when searching the google news archives. Having said all that, I'm not sure Mauda should redirect to Mouda or vice versa. Shivashree asserts that "Mauda" is the official name according to the Indian government, but does not provide a source and the article is unreferenced. Would be willing to support if someone can verify that Mauda is the official spelling. Jenks24 (talk) 23:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
http://mahaagri.gov.in/SoilConProsPlan/Nagpur/Mauda/title4.htm . Also, the interwiki link from Mouda goes to http://mr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8C%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%BE, with the Devenagari for Marathi spelling of "Mau-" (the first character has the "double quote" tag, which distinguishes a from o (single quote) from au (double quote)), according to http://www.omniglot.com/writing/marathi.htm -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, moving to support. Jenks24 (talk) 02:17, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support spelling correction and dab from Polish town with hatnote. Incoming link or two will need to be updated. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment - if this name change is important, why hasn't the article been updated with the correct information. It is difficult to change a title to something that is not reflected in the content of the article. --Mike Cline (talk) 11:59, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The image and infobox already said "Mauda". I've made the changes in the running text. It could be that editors thought the move needed to happen first, before the running text was changed, to avoid mismatching the title and bold title word in the lede. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mauda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150816202353/http://www.upay.org.in/z/index.php to http://www.upay.org.in/z/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]