Talk:Maud Island frog

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Maud Island frog is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There are also a small number of Maud island frogs at Karori Wildlife sanctuary which is located 3km outside of Wellington city centre.For more info goto www.sanctuary.org.nz/whatsnew/stories/MaudIslandFrogsFeb2006.html Darth russ (talk) 05:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Someone might want to check - the New Zealand Herald article 29 feb 2008 headed "Tiny Maud Island frogs make place in history" by Angela Gregory. It says 60 Maud Island frogs were released into a mouse proof enclosure in 2006 (Karori sactuary). This may or may not be correct. Carpenter0 (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it needs to be clarified whether the original release was in a separate mouse-proof enclosure, & the second release was in the general sanctuary (which may not yet be guaranteed to be mouse-free). If this is so, then maybe the article wording could be changed to explain this. Just a suggestion. GrahamBould (talk) 06:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.

For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link Transfer to Karori Wildlife Sanctuary is out of date. It should be rerouted of deleted. !Bruinfan12 (talk) 08:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

News Release

This news release may add information to the article. Ambrosia10 (talk) 23:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]