Talk:Mauatua
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Mauatua appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Tapa cloth is not woven
[edit]Sources referenced in the article and WP elsewhere consistently describe Tapa cloth as MADE or BEATEN, but never WOVEN. Weaving interlaces two sets of perpendicular fibers. Tapa, in contrast, begins as a sheet of bark that is beaten to become extremely thin, wide, and long. Various sheets are then beaten together in a wet process to create larger pieces, similar to Felt. Justaxn (talk) 02:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Justaxn, my misunderstanding. Thanks for leaving a message - I'll go and track down where I've used the incorrect terminology. Best Lajmmoore (talk) 09:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the oldest woman who went to Pitcairn with the Bounty mutineers was Mauatua? Source: [https://historymatters.sydney.edu.au/2017/05/the-women-of-pitcairn-and-their-descendants/ here - search for "oldest"
- ALT1: ... that Mauatua married the Bounty mutineer Fletcher Christian and ensured women on Pitcairn were given the vote? Source: After the Bounty:A Sailor's Account of the Mutiny, and Life in the South Seas - search for "vote"
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jean Walton
- Comment: from the Women in Red Oceania contest
Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 13:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough. Article complies with major content policies and is very solidly sourced, no copyvio issues detected. QPQ done. I find ALT1 more interesting and have edited to make it more succinct, feel free to revert if this isn't felt to be an improvement. I was able to verify the hook through the source given and it is also present in the article with an inline citation. I must note that whilst the person relating this fact is a distant relative and this possibly raises a COI issue at face value, I would expect an extensive degree of the bloodlines mixing after a given number of generations in a tiny tiny community like Pitcairn, so in all likelihood there isn't a plausible reason for this author to exaggerate the role of this particular person. I wonder if adding the year of this event (1838) would make the hook even more interesting. Regardless of the small print though, this is good to go. Thank you very much for a well-written article, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. --GGT (talk) 02:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Polynesia articles
- Low-importance Polynesia articles
- C-Class French Polynesia articles
- Low-importance French Polynesia articles
- French Polynesia articles
- C-Class Pitcairn Islands articles
- Mid-importance Pitcairn Islands articles
- Pitcairn Islands articles
- WikiProject Polynesia articles
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 210 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- Wikipedia Did you know articles