Text and/or other creative content from Mattress World of Michigan was copied or moved into Art Van with this edit on 2 June 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
I don't agree that the article is not notable. It is about a regional retail chain with 31 locations. There are plenty of articles in Wiki about regional retail chains that have not been proposed for deletion.Dwight Burdette (talk) 18:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you actually bothered to read the article, you would know that the chain is not limited to Michigan, but also has Indiana locations. Having said that, even if the chain was limited to one state, that would not detract from its notability. I can without much effort at all find numerous Wikipedia articles about businesses with much less of a geographical footprint. Regardless of the nature of its business, a retail operation which has multiple outlets is, ipso facto, notable. If the article merits more content, then that is an argument to request more content from contributors, not an argument for deleting the article. Dwight Burdette (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found additional sources about this chain. Since at least two of them have significant coverage the old AFD is null and I have restored the article with expanded content. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
