Talk:Matthew Turpin
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | A fact from Matthew Turpin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Trump administration security official Matthew Turpin believes the US and China are already in a new cold war? Source: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/should-the-us-pursue-a-new-cold-war-with-china/; https://www.thewirechina.com/2021/11/14/yes-this-is-a-cold-war/
- Reviewed:
Created by W9793 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Matthew Turpin; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Long enough, new enough. ALT1 cited, short enough, and interesting. No valid copyright concerns, no maintenance templates found, no neutrality problems found. This appears to be your third nomination, so QPQ unnecessary. Single-sentence sections are discouraged, although I can't find the relevant policy to that effect; as this is currently the oldest unreviewed nomination, I've knocked a few sections together to avoid undue delay. Good to go.--Launchballer 20:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)- Thank you for reviewing. W9793 (talk)
