Talk:Matthew Stirling (railway engineer)

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 May 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Trains

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Matthew Stirling was one of the remarkable Stirling family (3 generations: Reverend Robert Stirling, Patrick Stirling, Matthew Stirling) responsible for the advancement of steam engine design in the Victorian era. I can expand the document considerably, and although I agree with the principle of 'speedy deletion', I can only work on it for a few minutes at time and hence a few iterations will be required to expand it. The Edit Summary indicated it was a First Draft. So please let it 'live' longer than 10 minutes! MaltonMan 18:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest using your sandbox as a placeholder for first draft articles. Without sources or more substantial claims of notability than what was here, the article as it stands now isn't going to pass muster with most editors. DarkAudit 18:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are at least three possible references given by this search. I would suggest the article shouldn't be speedied. Addhoc 14:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]