Talk:Matthew Cradock

Matthew Cradock has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 4, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

There is probably enough family history information out there to confirm that Cradock the merchant is not Matthew Cradock the mayor. With the references I have right now, it looks like "original research" to assert that, though. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Matthew Cradock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look through this article. Mostly it's good, though I found the following concerns:

"Craddock was twice married." should be Cradock here to make it consistent throughout article
"Interest by London merchants in establishing and managing colonial settlements in North America waned after the 1724 failure of the London Company" Either this is irrelevant due to it being so far into the future or that's supposed to say 1624.

Just these couple small issues: I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh duh. It was 1624 of course. I've also fixed the crad[d]ock spelling. Magic♪piano 13:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Cradock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513192939/http://www.medfordhistorical.org/peculiarplantation.php to http://www.medfordhistorical.org/peculiarplantation.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]