Jump to content

Talk:Matthew Carrington, Baron Carrington of Fulham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Even after a relisting there's been basically no evidence presented that this is the primary topic of the name "Matthew Carrington" given that another subject of that name is covered extensively at another, more popular article. Cúchullain t/c 13:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Matthew Carrington (politician) → Matthew Carrington – The other person of this name does not even have his own article, he can be dealt with by a hatnote. --Relisted. EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC) PatGallacher (talk) 18:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also irrelevant. What matters, per WP:DAB, is whether a term refers to a topic that is covered in any article on Wikipedia, not whether it is the main subject discussed in a particular article or not, and not whether it is synonymous with the main subject discussed in a particular article or not (i.e., "A 'topic covered by Wikipedia' is either the main subject of an article, or a minor subject covered by an article in addition to the article's main subject"). Also, for what it's worth, 'hurricane' is not synonymous with 'tropical cyclone'. My understanding is that all hurricanes are tropical cyclones, but not all tropical cyclones are hurricanes. So far, in this discussion, no one has made any remark relevant to the question of whether or not the politician is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Matthew Carrington". —BarrelProof (talk) 16:29, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. A hatnote would work to direct readers to the other article. Calidum Talk To Me 00:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I agree with BarrelProof that it is irrelevant whether the student Matthew Carrington has an article titled with his name; the existence of the article Matt's Law is sufficient to show that the student Matthew Carrington is an encyclopedic topic. The question then becomes whether the student or the politician is clearly a primary topic. Without any evidence presented in the nomination regarding that question, I favor the status quo. Xoloz (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • From WP:TWODABS: If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, [...], or if both topics are obscure, then it is appropriate to have a disambiguation page at the base name. I think this is a borderline case, and my first inclination was to support the proposal, but a quick Google research (notwithstanding bias), showed much more hits for the student; on subsequent pages, they balanced out. It's more or less a coin toss, but I'd agree with Xoloz that the status quo is about fine. No such user (talk) 11:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose. My first reaction was that it should be moved, but on further investigation I found that the Matt's Law article significantly outweighs the politician in page views and, as No such user notes, a Google search also showed a lot more coverage for the student. So despite "Matthew Carrington (student)" not having an article I don't think it can be conclusively said that the majority of people (which is all that's really needed in a TWODABS case) searching for "Matthew Carrington" are looking for this politician. Jenks24 (talk) 11:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. A hatnote will do the job perfectly well. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Carrington, Baron Carrington of Fulham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Matthew_Carrington,_Baron_Carrington_of_Fulham&oldid=1198567904"