Talk:Mattanawcook Academy

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Maine

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Adding this to the page does nothing but perpetuate a negative view of the school. From time to time schools have minor issues such as this. By adding this to a nearly empty page, you are clearly looking to place the school in a negative light. Please cons) CamonBlaze (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I personally agree. Despite the fact it's the only sourced content on the page, the facts of what happened seem questionable and overinflated. On such a small article, it makes the school look really bad. And 2 fouls in a game doesn't really seem that bad or notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CamonBlaze (talk) 23:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)How do we go about permanently removing this? It doesn't seem to be a constructive addition.[reply]

Normally, you wait for more people to post, reach a consensus and then proceed to do what the consensus says. The problem is that no-one else seems to have edited this page for a month, so getting a reasonable number of people to agree that this section is stupid, and a complete recentism will take ages. I'm going to delete it, and hope that it doesn't get reverted (as I'm not a new user, it's less likely to get reverted). For reference, I'm a neutral person on this matter, and think the section is ridiculously out of place. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, works for me. I just want the the wiki page to be an accurate reflection of the school. It is a better depiction of the school without that one, out of place, section. CamonBlaze (talk) 00:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mattanawcook Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]