Talk:Matt Holliday/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: José Galindo (talk · contribs) 06:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Main review
[edit]Overall comments/Misc
[edit]- Everything is fine here I liked pretty much the article. It is complete, neutral, with images and with many references. --José Galindo (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Copyvio rating: 69.1% chance of violation of this page. But I dont find it a violation because only words and short phrases are copied, not entire paragraphs.
Lead
[edit]Background and construction
[edit]- My only advice is to review frequently the links.
Controversy
[edit]- I dont find a controversy in the article.
Overall review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: (Pass)
- Pass or Fail: (Pass)
Very nice article, deep, complete and maybe with some minors typos but easily to fix. Congratulations to the persons who contributed in the article.--José Galindo (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)