Talk:Matchbook FX

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV / peacock

This article is a candidate for an NPOV tag. Possible peacock terms and other phrasing not necessarily appropriate for an encyclopedia article include:

"hailed" as
"concept . . . quite novel"
"groundbreaking"
"main catalysts"
"history-making"
"dramatic technological innovation"
"earliest pioneers"
"wreaked havoc"

The above has been addressed.

Sourcing

I've removed all the "unique", "innovated", "first of", etc. claims that were unsourced. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while googling this company I came across some newer sources that seem to have lifted their material directly from this article. These are obviously unsuitable as reliable sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]