Talk:Masters of Cinema

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 10 April 2017, see discussion.
keep, 23 December 2015, see discussion.
keep, July 31, 2006, see discussion.

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Someone pegged this page as being "an advertisement" and being about a "non-notable website". This page is perfectly legitimate, it is information about "Masters of Cinema" and the website is far from "non-notable", it is award-winning, non-profit based, and has been around for over five years. N. W. Peerpee 16:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the website is so notable and has been around for so long, how come there are no listed citings by major news agencies, magazines, etc? Please add some quickly if you wish to prevent the deletion. You may also wish to comment on the AfD page, rather than on the article's talk page. LinaMishima 21:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP

i WOULD vote with my feet to keep this site. It is non-commercial in nature, maintained by the devotees of the Art known as Cinema and thus belongs to the general treasure of knowledge, rightfully here in wikipedia. I personally have seen entries in this encyclopedia with infinitely less content and shallow essence, so why the heck not a professional site (one of its kind) entirely devoted to the true masters of Cinema? There are many people across the world who sacrifice their time and energy , sometimes at the expense of their families and friends to keep that great resource going! IMO it would be a big loss to Wikipedia if you delete this article. Please consider keeping it. Thank u in advance.

This isn't really the place for that comment. It belongs at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masters of cinema. What's more, the hard work of the people at the MoC site isn't really a criterion for it's place as an encyclopedic entry. Jun-Dai 02:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Release list

If the "list of Criterion Collection" page is gonna be deleted then logically it follows that the list of releases on this page should also be removed. I personally am against both decisions, but either both should stay or both should go as it would hypocritical to remove one but not the other. Energizerspark (talk) 20:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely it should not be here per WP:NOTCATALOG for exactly the same reason the Criterion list and all other lists of this kind were deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Powerhouse Films releases; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Film Institute releases; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Twilight Time releases; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of BBC home video releases, the list goes on... --wooden superman 12:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]