Talk:MasterCard Priceless Surprises Presents Gwen Stefani/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 10:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outstanding work with the article, I'm tempted to pass it as it is, though I do have some minor recommendations.

The lead does mention the exact dates of the concerts, but does not mention where they were held.

Done

"the starting price for a ticket was $79" - this makes me wonder what the price went up to. Can you find any coverage of this?

I'm afraid I cannot find anything else other than the $79 figure. Carbrera (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

"became sold-out quickly" - can you be more specific than quickly? No worries if your sources can't be more accurate than this.

Done – I reworded it. Carbrera (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

"perform one last show in Japan at the Zepp Diver City event" - Japan is a big place, and most people won't have a clue where this venue is. I'd suggest specifying it is in Tokyo.

Done

I don't think you should pipe 'Zepp Diver City' to Zepp. Why not just link the work Zepp itself?

Done

Why is attendance of the Tokyo concert marked as "N/A"? The article for Zepp states the venues capacity is 2,473. Can you at least add this information even if you can't find out whether it was sold out of not?

Done

It's not a requirement for GA, but I do strongly suggest you archive your sources. It's only a matter of time before the links start rotting.

I agree. Do you know how to archive all of the sources at once instead of doing them individually? I'm afraid I do not. Carbrera (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

If there's a way to do them all at once that would certainly save me a lot of time haha. I find it's too monotonous to archive an entire pages sources at once so I generally only do half a dozen at a time and chip away at it slowly. Freikorp (talk) 01:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking forward to passing this soon. Freikorp (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Freikorp – I completed addressing your points. Thank you very much for this review. Carbrera (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Happy for this to pass now, though I think replacing 'N/A' with 'Unknown' or something similar that clarifies to the reader that this data isn't available would be appropriate. Also you'll need to update the totals at the bottom of the table now. Well done overall. Freikorp (talk) 01:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]