Jump to content

Talk:Massimo Ellul

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

[edit]

Could the author of the article (or anyone knowledgeable) please use the <ref> tags to indicate which reference is used with each section of this article? Help in referencing can be found here at WP:REF. Thanks. ~ ► Wykebjs ◄ (userpage | talk) 18:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Massimo Ellul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article is too promotional and should be more objective. It should strive to provide a more balanced and neutral perspective on Mr. Ellul's career and contributions. I also observed that there are some grammatical issues, such as missing commas and run-on sentences, which can make it difficult to read and understand. Also, it uses a mix of citation styles, making it appear disorganized. A consistent and proper citation format should be used for clarity and credibility. Jkyem24 (talk) 23:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]