Jump to content

Talk:Massachusetts School of Law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:MassLawLogo.gif

[edit]

Image:MassLawLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

I'm wondering if it would make sense to merge the American College of History & Legal Studies article (more of a stub than anything) into this one. ACH&LS was set up as a feeder school into the Massachusetts School of Law, with which it shared resources, marketing, etc. The college only existed for a few years, got very little press, has no notable alums at this point, and didn't have any impact on academic publishing. All of its marketing emphasized its connection to MSL, as did the few newspaper articles about it. And while this shouldn't be a determining factor in and of itself, the ACH&LS article has no real hope of ever growing beyond stub status, so we don't need to worry about a brief section on the college dominating the law school's article. Should we merge? Beginning (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No real reason to merge the pages as this school was a seperate entity operating in New Hampshire not Massachusetts. The graduates of ACHLS deserve their own page and place historically. There are other schools in Wiki that no longer exist but also made significant contributions deserving of recognition. 50.205.244.174 (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A "feeder school" is not a judgment, not a technical term. The schools were located in different states. They went through a different process of accreditation. They have very little press.
Is "no notable alums" original research or is that based on a census that you took?
Any rationale for combining these pages is as strong, if not stronger, for other law schools with feeder programs. No one would suggest combining University of Massachusetts with University of Massachusetts School of Law.
It would do nothing to improve the Massachusetts School of Law page by adding a historical school in a different state, with different staff, different branding etc.
The label should be removed and the separate schools should be left as separate pages. 75.115.224.95 (talk) 19:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The crux of the proposal is that the American College of History and Legal Studies operated as a "feeder school" for the Massachusetts School of Law. The wikipedia article for "feeder school" redirects to college-preparatory school. This is an inaccurate description of a college which issued Bachelor's Degrees and offered admission to a Graduate degree program.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College-preparatory_school
Materials "emphasized the connection" between the schools. That does not seem a sufficient basis for combining schools with relationships such as Radcliffe and Harvard, or the many schools which operate under the umbrella of the latter label.
Only existed for a few years. Got very little press. No notable alums. Did not affect academic publishing.
All of those assertions should be quantifiable and verifiable. What is the minimum number of years, press, notable alums, and affect on academic publishing other schools need to verify before articles are deleted? What are the metrics for each of these assertions? 75.115.224.95 (talk) 19:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge on the grounds of short text and context. The schools was a short-lived initiative of Massachusetts School of Law and its merge would improve the Massachusetts School of Law page (which is currently very short). Klbrain (talk) 12:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Massachusetts_School_of_Law&oldid=1208856991"