Jump to content

Talk:Mass media in Sweden/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Journalist bias

This section is very poorly written. Twice it is stated that "Media in Sweden is often criticized of..." without proper sources. The first time it is backed up by a study showing that unionized journalists have sympathies more to the left than the general population. That is presumably true for union members in general and in any case does not show a journalistic bias. In the second case it is backed up by a quote from an individual journalist, which was obviously selected to back up the opinion of the author. I don't see how one could possibly draw any general conclusions about Swedish journalism from the fact that "somebody said something stupid". I will also add that translating opartiskhet with fairness might be somewhat misleading, though technically correct. I think impartiality or possibly detachment would get closer to the original meaning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.110.51 (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Yea, i agree. It seems like someone (possibly not even swedish), is putting personal opinion into the mix... 178.174.232.139 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Media of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Updated statistics from 2011 instead of 1999

Here are the results of a survey among 2500 randomly selected Swedish journalists, by Kent Asp, Professor of journalism at the Gothenburg University, of which 60% responded.

Of note is that 41% of Swedish journalists voted for the Green Party in 2011. Among journalists employed by the state owned Swedish Television the number was 52%, and for Swedish Radio it was 54%:

https://www.journalisten.se/nyheter/svenska-journalister-foredrar-miljopartiet

https://www.affarsvarlden.se/bors-ekonominyheter/sa-rostar-journalisterna-6669449

https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/5VjQjz/mp-favoritparti-bland-journalister

https://www.svt.se/opinion/svt-och-sr-dags-att-erkanna-era-partisympatier

https://www.jmg.gu.se/digitalAssets/1369/1369226_journalist-2011-journalistboken-kap-13.pdf

David A (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Weeklies do not exist in Sweden?

I was expecting this article to mention weekly newspapers, they are usually more interesting than dailies. For example, in Denmark we have Weekendavisen. I saw the category sv:Kategori:Svenska veckotidningar but most of them are defunct. Is it really the case that there are no more weeklies in Sweden? If that is the case, the article should mention it. --Ysangkok (talk) 19:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mass_media_in_Sweden/Archive_1&oldid=1170133864"